Current annual process cost
Volume × minutes per case × hourly cost + rework + relevant operating cost.
Business case
Quick answer: A fixed price without a defined process scope is not responsible. A useful estimate combines one-off implementation cost, recurring platform/operations cost and the human work that remains. Compare total future cost with today’s process cost, then calculate net benefit and payback.
Do not calculate build cost alone. Include current manual time, errors, waiting, licences, implementation, testing, operations and change cost. A smaller process with clear rules can be more attractive than a large use case with many exceptions.
Source status
The calculation structure is our decision model. The hypothetical example is not a price benchmark, quote or market average; use your own volumes, costs and operating burden for a real business case.
Look beyond the initial build effort.
A business case does not need to rely only on headcount savings.
Start with your own volumes and timings.
How often does the process occur each week or month?
How many active minutes does one case require?
How often does something fail and what does recovery cost?
What one-off and recurring costs does the solution introduce?
What saving or quality improvement is realistic after stabilisation?
A business case is a decision model, not a guarantee.
Model conservative, likely and favourable scenarios. Include operations and change. If the case only works when every exception is automated perfectly, the design is probably too optimistic.
Use your own volumes and loaded labour cost. Include only benefits you can evidence.
Volume × minutes per case × hourly cost + rework + relevant operating cost.
Residual human effort + licences/platform + monitoring/support + change. Keep one-off implementation separate for payback.
Current annual process cost − future annual TCO. Only monetise quality/risk benefits when they can be reasonably evidenced.
One-off implementation investment ÷ average monthly net benefit. Test at least a conservative, likely and upside scenario.
The numbers below are solely a calculation example, not a Boermans Digital/Korper price indication, quote or benchmark.
| Component | Example | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 250 cases per month | 3,000 per year |
| Current handling | 10 minutes per case at €45 loaded hourly cost | ≈ €22,500 per year |
| Rework | Hypothetical €300 per month | €3,600 per year |
| Current direct cost | Labour + rework | ≈ €26,100 per year |
| Future state | 15 human hours/month + €450 platform/operations | ≈ €13,500 per year |
| Annual net benefit | €26,100 − €13,500 | ≈ €12,600 per year |
| One-off implementation | Hypothetical €9,000 | Payback ≈ 8.6 months |
Not all human work disappears. Exceptions, control, monitoring and change remain. A business case should still work when the solution captures less than 100% of the workload.
A strong case should not rely only on the upside scenario.
Short answers for a transparent business case without false precision.
Cost depends on scope, volume, systems, integrations, exceptions, security, testing and operations. Without a concrete process scope, one fixed figure creates false certainty.
At minimum: current volume, active handling time, errors/rework, roles involved, loaded labour cost, operating burden and the expected one-off and recurring solution cost.
Divide the one-off implementation investment by average monthly net benefit. Include recurring platform, support and change cost and test multiple scenarios.
No. Error reduction, lead time, availability, auditability and lower operating risk can create value too. Monetise those benefits only when you can reasonably evidence them.
When it only works with 100% straight-through processing, zero operations, no exceptions or unrealistically high time savings. Explicitly test a conservative scenario.